Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-
Chuck Schumer says "Trump's not even in the country while we're dealing with this shutdown."
Chuck Schumer, and everyone else, need to realize something: There's no such thing as "the minority leader." That's like saying "The official spokesperson for the loser."
Chuck has already lost. He'll be primaried in the mid-terms and have to look for a real job. But Starbucks is closing shops, an McDonalds is downstaffing, so he'll be kinda SOL for a job with his qualifications.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Do you think they'll really primary him?
Chuck Schumer was disloyal to the Democrats when he voted with
Republicans on a funding bill back in March.
Even Biden knew better than to bite the hand that feeds him.
Even Biden knew better than to bite the hand that feeds him.
But Chuck has nothing to offer anymore. No political pull. No income other than what he steals from the taxpayers.
Chuck's constituents are even more radical left and don't want him
either. And, really, in about 5 years, his district will be gone
anyway. No people means they don't need a representative.
Do you think they'll really primary him?
Chuck Schumer was disloyal to the Democrats when he voted with
Republicans on a funding bill back in March.
Even Biden knew better than to bite the hand that feeds him.
But Chuck has nothing to offer anymore. No political pull. No income other than what he steals from the taxpayers.
Chuck's constituents are even more radical left and don't want him
either. And, really, in about 5 years, his district will be gone
anyway. No people means they don't need a representative.
No, Chuck is a senator, so he don't have a district. When we elect Elise Stefanik for governor in the near future we'll have the opportunity to
get rid of a few house districts since so many of them have been fraudulently created over the past few years.
On 29 Oct 2025, Aaron Thomas said the following...
Do you think they'll really primary him?
Yes, AOC will do it.
Chuck Schumer was disloyal to the Democrats when he voted with Republicans on a funding bill back in March.
Even Biden knew better than to bite the hand that feeds him.
This shut down hurt the Democrats and not Trump.
Do you think they'll really primary him?
Yes, AOC will do it.
Plus 1 more year of Trump winning... AOC will loose the Senate race to
the Republican Challenger.
BTW, Elise Stefanik may/is going to challenge Hochul for Governor and Elise is leading in the polls.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
The bots have been programmed to think that "experience" is what
matters in elections. Who's more "experienced" than Chuck Schumer? The Foundation won't primary him and the hive will only be able to choose between Chuck and a Republican challenger.
No, Chuck is a senator, so he don't have a district.
When we elect
Elise Stefanik for governor in the near future we'll have the
opportunity to get rid of a few house districts since so many of them
have been fraudulently created over the past few years.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Chuck and Dollar Store Barry live not far from each other. Had the Democrats chose leaders who live away from each other their
constituents might reflect those 2 better... But you have the same
people Yelling at Barry .0001 and Chuck to keep going... These same people from the same area of NY.
Yes, AOC will do it.
She will do anything that The Foundation asks her to do, but do they
want her to do that? Chuck has won a lot of elections; I think they'd stick with him.
I like that and I'm optimistic, but I'm also wondering who made that choice for me? If it was Trump, then fine. But if it was a Republican committee, then I'm not happy about it. I don't know if she has the
energy or the ambition to do it, or if she's just being someone's puppet.
They primaried Trump; but Elise Stefanik is so good that we don't need a primary? I don't buy that.
No surprise.
When you see the political map of the U.S. it's 99% Republican with very small areas (usually s#!thole cities) as blue. The Dems represent a
very, very small part of the country.
Hence their calls to eliminate the Electoral College.
I'm not sure who you mean by they... They... the "Normal" Democrats??
The Days of JFK-Type Democrats are gone.
Recall Bernie recently was holding Town halls with her... I think the party is grooming her for bigger things... Chuck's seat or a 2028 run.
The Democrats are sooooooooooooo out of sync with the American Citizens that they'll do exactly that.
It's not even the same party since Clinton got his Blow Job.
In your State Elise is leading in the polls for Governor as well.
November 2025 and November 2026, the midterms, the people of NY will
see how Mamdani performs as Mayor... and that doesn't look too good...
and I think Mamdani getting elected in 2025 would be like Biden getting elected in 2020.
you might have a rough year in NY but I do believe its turning itself around.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Things are shaping up though... NJ could be Red soon and Virginia may elect Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears... Why can Republicans elect smart women while Democrats can't??
IB Joe wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
I think there is a fracture in the Democrat party.
There were the old
guard of the party... Lets say Chuck Schumer... and the new and active far left America-Hating-Marxist... Lets say AOC et al.
I'm not sure who you mean by they... They... the "Normal" Democrats??
The Days of JFK-Type Democrats are gone.
The Democrats are sooooooooooooo out of sync with the American Citizens that they'll do exactly that.
As In type this I can say... There is NO differences between Chuck and AOC... NONE...
It's not even the same party since Clinton got his Blow Job.
2016 attempt... SO... they can Hillary in for 2016. All the evidence showing what the Democrats did to sabotage Trump's 2016, 2020 and 2024 elections and what they did during his 1st term is evidence of this and supports my claim enough.
The Democrats and AOC are soooooo blind to what America want that
they'll run her for Senate or President soon.
Think about it... Chuck shut the Government down for a month to try to
get funding for Illegals.
I Know this is in your back yard, and I have said this to you in the
past. Relax... Trump not getting into office in 2020 was not the end
of the world. What that did was show everyone what the Democrats were
all about now.
Aaron Thomas wrote to IB Joe <=-
Not even JFK can be labeled a "good Democrat" though; their party is a spin-off from the Confederacy and under the "Democrat" label they segregated and still continue to segregate.
They used to say things that sounded logical back then. Even Obama with his "affordable health care for all Americans" sounded a lot better
than "free health care for all illegal immigrants." The burning
question is: How did they create a population of people stupid enough
to swallow this new slogan?
Because the Democrats have no smart people.
than "free health care for all illegal immigrants." The burning question is: How did they create a population of people stupid enough to swallow this new slogan?
They infiltrated the public education system a long time ago.
It's been over 30 years since I was in high school, but even back then I asked my dad why the schools seem intent on producing brainless workers and actively blocking anyone who wanted to do better (i.e. think for themselves).
Zaplook300 wrote to Dr. What <=-
Because the Democrats have no smart people.
At least they're not fascists...
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
That's part of the miseducation problem; the old plan was to inform us about slavery and the new plan is to make everyone pay for it like
we're the ones who were cracking the whips, like the victims are still alive, and we're still guilty of it even if we're Republican voters
from northern states.
We actually need new laws to protect against racial exploitation, particularly in universities, research centers, and in the media.
than "free health care for all illegal immigrants." The burning question is: How did they create a population of people stupid en
to swallow this new slogan?
They infiltrated the public education system a long time ago.
It's been over 30 years since I was in high school, but even back then
asked my dad why the schools seem intent on producing brainless worker
and actively blocking anyone who wanted to do better (i.e. think for themselves).
That's part of the miseducation problem; the old plan was to inform u about slavery and the new plan is to make everyone pay for it like we're the ones who were cracking the whips, like the victims are stil alive, and we're still guilty of it even if we're Republican voters from northern states.
I think you're letting "slavery" distract from the real plan.
But if you were "above average" you were punished until you started
acting like an "average" student. Looking back, this actually started
for me in the 4th grade.
We actually need new laws to protect against racial exploitation, particularly in universities, research centers, and in the media.
Those laws already exist. But the Left has not enforced them or did what they often do: change the definition of words to get around the laws.
The looks on their faces turned ghastly. You could almost see their thoughts twisting inside their skulls their lips curling in disgust,
their faces tightening into visible torment. As I kept scrolling through the articles, they grew even more uncomfortable, glancing at one another in disbelief. Glorious, it was.
Both parties have their statist groove thang. Nations around the world are going to force people to register to post stuff so government can raid people's homes for saying the wrong political narrative just like what is happening in the United Kingdom.At least they're not fascists...
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Redirecting blame for slavery is just 1 of the things they're teaching,
of course there's much more to their agenda. But that's what comes to
mind when I think about "ways the schools are brainwashing the kids."
What do you mean by "punished?" The way I see it now is the above
average students are being punished by getting a lousy education that's designed for under-achievers.
We need them to be more strict to prevent things like:
* Skin colored statistics
* Skin colored rationing of Paxlovid
* Racially segregated school field trips
* Allowing colleges to refer to themselves as "Historically black."
* Skin colored voting districts
* The Black Caucus
* Use of phrases like "black community"
* Use of the N-word on broadcast television
Republicans are missing an opportunity by not taking action against all this stuff.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
Here's the thing. Sitting within the workplace, I can hear the group
the muttering, the murmurs, the constant echo of self-righteous venom, spewing from their lips growing more vile by the moment. Even wishing Trump would be killed. It was vulgar and nasty.
What's worse is that they sit there nodding, shaking their heads in agreement as a group, truly believing every word spilling out, amongst themselves. They believe with total conviction that they're right. No hesitation. No pause. They actually believe it, as if there is nothing wrong within their own heads.
As for me, I just sit there quietly, just listening, not saying a word just taking all of that smug, self-righteous filth pouring freely into
my ears as if it were word-porn.
In my head I'm thinking, "If you people, could only hear yourselves,
right now." Me, being on the ultra-right, I need not react.
The looks on their faces turned ghastly. You could almost see their thoughts twisting inside their skulls their lips curling in disgust,
their faces tightening into visible torment. As I kept scrolling
through the articles, they grew even more uncomfortable, glancing at
one another in disbelief. Glorious, it was.
| Sysop: | hdt |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, Vic, |
| Users: | 13 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 95:08:16 |
| Calls: | 56 |
| Files: | 218 |
| Messages: | 28,880 |